#include <vector>
#include <functional>

class Failing {
public:
  double testVal{};
};

class TestSection {
public:
  enum class TestEnum : uint8_t {
    A
  };

  void TestMethod() {
    std::vector<Failing> Tests{};
    TestEnum TestEnum_{ TestEnum::A };
    auto start_it = std::find_if(Tests.cbegin(), Tests.cend(), [](const Failing& /*tester*/) { return true; });
    auto end_it = std::find_if(start_it, Tests.cend(), [](const Failing& /*tester*/) { return true; });
    auto use_condition = (1 == 0) ?
      ((TestEnum_ == TestEnum::A) ?
        std::function([&]() -> bool { return true; })
        : std::function([&]() -> bool { return true; }))
      : std::function([&]() -> bool { return true; });

    for (; start_it != end_it; start_it++)
    {
      const Failing& notIndexed = *start_it; // when starting to type "notIndexed" in the next line, there aren't any IntelliSense suggestions. When disabling Visual Assist, it works fine.
      
    }
  }
};

#include <iostream>

#include <vector>
#include <functional>

class Failing {
public:
  double testVal{};
};

class TestSection {
public:
  enum class TestEnum : uint8_t {
    A
  };

  void TestMethod() {
    std::vector<Failing> Tests{};
    TestEnum TestEnum_{ TestEnum::A };
    auto start_it = std::find_if(Tests.cbegin(), Tests.cend(), [](const Failing& /*tester*/) { return true; });
    auto end_it = std::find_if(start_it, Tests.cend(), [](const Failing& /*tester*/) { return true; });
    auto use_condition = (1 == 0) ?
      ((TestEnum_ == TestEnum::A) ?
        std::function<bool()>([&]() -> bool { return true; })
        : std::function<bool()>([&]() -> bool { return true; }))
      : std::function<bool()>([&]() -> bool { return true; });

    for (; start_it != end_it; start_it++)
    {
      const Failing& notIndexed = *start_it; // #1 at this line I create the variable
      // #2 at this line you have to start typing "notIndexed", and the expected outcome would be to see the correct IntelliSense suggestion. You can also type "notIndexed.", and I would expect it to propose me "testVal", since this is the only public property of the "notIndexed" object.
    }
  }
};

int main()
{
    std::cout << "Hello World!\n";
}

quote:

---

Originally posted by feline

Please don't apologise, I am just trying to understand the problem.

---

quote:

---

Do you mean you are typing on a NEW line, after the variable "notIndexed" has already been defined? If so, the variable IS being suggested for me.

---

quote:

---

This version of the code complies quite happily for me, thank you for the edited version of the code.

---

quote:

---

Do you have:

VA Options -> Coloring and Attributes -> Show local symbols in bold

turned On or Off? With this setting turned On, "notIndexed" is being shown in bold for me on the line where it is declared. If it is not being shown in bold for you then this would be a clue, since it would tell us that VA is not properly picking this up as a local variable. Obviously if VA doesn't understand that this is a local variable for some reason then this would be why it isn't being suggested for you.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by feline
Which IDE and version of VA are you using?

---

quote:

---

I am now getting the problem, even though I haven't changed the code, and didn't get it before. Trying a second machine, and trying to make sense of this, since I would prefer this to be a consistent problem if possible

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by feline

Thank you for the details, and for how to fix this. I have put in a bug report for this:

case=150105

---

quote:

---

I figured out why I was getting different results, if you Enable IDE intellisense then the variable and its member is suggested. If you Disable IDE intellisense then it is not suggested.

The normal way to disable IDE intellisense is via the setting:

IDE tools menu -> Options -> Text Editor -> C/C++ -> Advanced -> Disable Database = True

so if the extra CPU load from IDE parsing isn't causing a problem you might want to turn the IDE intellisense parser back on for now.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by feline

Have you tried this in a new, default C++ solution? That is how I tested this, along with inside my normal test solution.

---

quote:

---

If that is how you tested this, would you be able to send me your test solution, along with your settings please. I can then try the same test here, and see what results I get.

---