|
myth5
Starting Member
1 Posts |
 Posted - Jan 06 2014 : 07:58:46 AM
|
class define:
template<typename T, template<typename E, typename = std::allocator<E> > class CONT = std::deque> // deque has default template parameter
class Stack7 {
public:
Stack7();
~Stack7();
void Push(T const& element);
void Pop();
T Top() const;
bool IsEmpty() const {
return elements_.empty();
}
template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename = std::allocator<E1> > class CONT1>
Stack7<T, CONT>& operator=(Stack7<T1, CONT1> const& object);
private:
CONT<T> elements_;
};
follow code is create by "Refactory(VA)->Create Implemention",
template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /*= std::allocator<E1> */> class CONT1>
Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7::operator=(Stack7<T1* / , CONT1> const& object)
{
}
template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /*= std::allocator<E> */> class CONT /*= std::deque*/>
void Stack7<T, E, CONT>::Push(T const& element)
{
}
actually the right code is like this,
operator= function:
template<typename T, template<typename, typename > class CONT>
template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /*= std::allocator<E1> */> class CONT1>
Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7<T, CONT>::operator=(Stack7<T1 , CONT1> const& object)
{
}
Push funtion:
template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /*= std::allocator<E> */> class CONT /*= std::deque*/>
void Stack7<T, CONT>::Push(T const& element)
{
}
maybe the description is incorrect,but the code say all. |
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
19024 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2014 : 12:45:28 PM
|
I am seeing the same effect here. Thank you for the clear description.
case=79393
For now you are going to need to fix the declarations manually, but hopefully VA is doing enough to make this feature useful, and hopefully you are not seeing this problem to often. |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
 |
|
Template parameter create implemention error
