| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| kennyl |
Posted - Sep 03 2012 : 10:39:16 PM
Why is this not provided?
Regards,
Kenny |
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| sean |
Posted - Jul 18 2016 : 10:53:12 PM
case=10239 is implemented in build 2107. |
| accord |
Posted - Sep 05 2012 : 4:18:29 PM
Thank you for the explanation. |
| kennyl |
Posted - Sep 04 2012 : 10:30:04 PM
quote:
Originally posted by accord
Anyway, what is your opinion on this? How often would you use it?
Indeed I need to do that rarely, but still there is this case: when I need to change some function into template function, moving code to header file is required.
Another case is when I need to change a small class that some of its methods are written in source file, then I found I need this class in many other projects, yet the class is small and it's not necessary to export it, so I decide to move all its code to header file such that all I need to do is include this header file in the other projects.
Regards,
Kenny |
| accord |
Posted - Sep 04 2012 : 09:49:13 AM
To answer this question, I will have to guess. I think that moving the implementation to the header is a much rarer situation than the opposite. Personally, I think it would be logical to provide it, but to be honest, I want to do this rarely, compared with the "Move Implementation to Source File".
We are, however, considering doing this at some point:
case=10239
Anyway, what is your opinion on this? How often would you use it? |
|
|
